Anita Sarkeesian’s latest video is important and a must-watch

Dragons_Crown_01

Usually, when big industry names tweet about a new game development, leak screen shots, or even tell us what they had for lunch, word gets around pretty quickly. Twitter has become Facebook Lite for the media, allowing fast-paced release of all the awesome stuff we love. So when writer, director, and comic book legend Joss Whedon and LucasArts veteran and game designer Tim Schafer tweet about controversial figure Anita Sarkeesian’s latest installment of her Tropes vs. Women series, people are bound to take notice.

I think you should, too. Go ahead, I’ll wait.

WARNING: NSFW

Sarkeesian, who works under the name Feminist Frequency, is creating an “on-going series of video commentaries that explore gender representations, myths, and messages in popular culture media” according to her YouTube channel. That channel has been around for five years and hosts over 40 videos on topics ranging from advertising, celebrity news, and, more recently, videogames.

Her latest video focuses on “Women as Background Decoration.”

Sarkeesian argues that we, as players, see a “subset of largely insignificant non-playable female characters whose sexuality or victimhood is exploited as a way to infuse edgy, gritty, or racy flavoring into game worlds. These sexually objectified female bodies are designed to function as environmental texture while titillating presumed straight male players.” It’s a succinct and thought-provoking way to explain the phenomenon of sexual objectification of women that we, as players, seem to gloss over as “okay,” simply because we’re so used to it.

We’ve all played a good percentage of the games highlighted in this video and many of them are very good indeed - if not all of them. But seeing nearly 30 minutes of game clips highlighting the overt sexualization, abuse - both physical and mental - and murder of women is, to put it mildly, a bit of a punch in the gut. In Red Dead Redemption we want to save the prostitute who is being assaulted out in front of the saloon by a filthy cowboy because we feel it’s the right thing to do, but when she’s killed in the story later on anyway, despite our good intentions, we feel a sense of rage and happily shoot the man cold dead. But when Sarkeesian points out that the woman is punched, kicked, and shot for no other reason than to illustrate that the man who did it to her is the bad guy, that gives us a moment of pause.

Does that mean a character is evil because he abuses a woman, or is he simply an evil man who happens to include beating women as part of his repertoire? If this same character kidnaps a man, and beats him, and then shoots him, is he equally as evil if his victim wasn’t sexualized in the same way that his female victim just was? Perhaps the larger questions that Sarkeesian is posing is two fold: 1.) Why does the industry continue to place women in these victimized roles, and 2.) Why are we, as the industry’s consumers, okay with that? Are we simply used to it? Maybe.

Here are some of the statistics she outlines: 1 out of every 5 women in the US will be raped in their lifetimes. 1 in four will be sexually assaulted. Sarkeesian continues, “When games casually use sexualized violence as a ham-fisted form of character development for the bad guys, it reinforces a popular misconception about gender violence by framing it as something abnormal, as a cruelty only committed by the most transparently evil strangers. In reality, however, violence against women, and sexual violence in particular, is a common, every day occurrence, often perpetrated by “normal” men known and trusted by those targeted.”

So, because the portrayal of a random act of violence by a stranger against a victimized woman (more often than not, a prostitute) is not reflective of real life, then we should still feel justified in hunting down the perpetrator and killing him, right? Well, no. The industry, as evidenced from the numerous clips above (and that’s definitely not all of them out there), is not only in the habit of marginalizing and abusing women as character types, they are, perhaps inadvertently or not, trivializing a real-world experience that women in the world have already had, will have in the future, or simply fear they might have.

I felt a little overwhelmed after my initial viewing; I’d seen most of these clips before and played most of those games myself, but getting the slideshow view of dozens of the same scenarios being acted out over and over again, with Sarkeesian concisely explaining what it’s doing and why she feels that it’s not okay gave me a new view on the larger problem that she is attempting to address with her videos, made me think of them in a new light. I had never though, during any of my playthroughs, about what these images were actually doing. Even as a woman, sure, I may not like that there are prostitutes everywhere, but like many I might shrug and say to myself, “Well, they exist, right? Now, in the old west, in Renaissance Italy — everywhere. So, I guess that’s that.” Did I not see the victimization because it’s so prevalent or because I never considered it as a real world problem, even though it is?

Whether you’re a feminist or not, Sarkeesian places this problem on the table and says, “Look. This is what we’re doing. This isn’t right. Why aren’t we more upset about it?”

And it isn’t right. The games industry has grown from what used to be a past-time enjoyed by kids in their bedrooms into a multi-billion dollar industry that now generates more revenue per year than Hollywood. What was once a nice hobby has become arguably the leading entertainment industry on the planet, and so it has a responsibility to grow up. If it wants to continue to grow - and the rise of Nintendo’s Wii and the mobile gaming sector has shown that there’s a huge market out there who want to play games - then publishers, developers and the gaming community all need to wake up and address the fact that gaming is no longer a male hobby.

The same can be said about race, religion and sexual preferences — why aren’t we more upset about this kind of blatant marginalization, sexualization, and mistreatment? Not just of women, but of people in general? Just because no one is being mentally or physically abusive to you, right now, this second, doesn’t mean that someone else, right now, this second, isn’t being abused or suffering from discrimination. We may just be “playing a videogame” but is that putting us into a fantasy state of mind where we think the images, words, and actions are okay to do? It seems like it might be, and it’s definitely worth a continuing dialogue about it - if only to force the industry to finally accept that if it wants to appeal to a wider audience, it needs to stop pandering to such a narrow one and start acting more responsibly.

Refreshingly, the mood in the video is not one of trail-blazing, male-flag-burning feminism - despite the accusations that are regularly leveled at Sarkeesian. She addresses an issue, brings it to the front, explains it from her perspective, and asks us to think about it. It’s unfortunate then that such a professional and respectable approach can be met with equally as much hate as it can be met with support, as evidenced by the activity on her Twitter account - not to mention the recent furore surrounding the abuse leveled at Depression Quest‘s developer Zoe Quinn and anyone who dared defend her. Discrimination in gaming is an issue, and you don’t have to be a feminist or “Social Justice Warrior” to see it, believe in it, or to fight against it.

If big names, big male names like Whedon and Schafer, can positively get behind such a well-articulated point of view, perhaps the industry should seriously start looking at its reasons for believing it needs to portray “Women as Background Decoration” to illustrate a minor plot or character point. Perhaps we, as consumers, need to take an additional step toward reducing and eliminating this kind of violence toward women (or any non-white, non-straight male) by speaking with our wallets, rather than shrugging it off and buying the latest blockbuster because “it’s only a videogame.”

Jenna Fraser
A New England born, Boston native, Jenna says "wicked" with reckless abandon. She loves video games almost as much as she loves words and to say that she has an obsession with Queen would be the biggest understatement of all time.
Jenna Fraser

@@jfraser_CP

Editor @ContinuePlayMag. Awesome. Humble. In that order. Actor, artist, gamer, and incurably obsessed with Queen.
RT @ContinuePlayMag: Continue Play is now based in #London! #londongaming @beefjack - 10 months ago
Written By
 

Related posts

  • realist123

    I will not give that scam artist views or attention. The industry is fine the way it is. if she doesn’t like then she can go somewhere else. Also glad I am using adblocker and not giving you any ad revenue for promoting this fool.

    • Joe Yang

      That seems like a really reactionary response, though. Have you ever checked out a site like fatuglyorslutty.com? I’m going to go out on a limb and assume (please correct me if I’m wrong) that you’re male.

      Though men do have their own issues, it’s ultimately issues that are separate from women, and while I don’t agree with a lot of Sarkeesian’s analysis in many of her video, it’s nevertheless a pertinent issue. Storytelling does favour a particular power dynamic, and it does sorta relegate women to the position of functional, emotional animals quite often.

      Her incredibly belated response to her Kickstarter, her flip-flopping and sometimes pandering identity, and her often-times sex-negative feminist analysis is troublesome, I think this video in particular bears argumentative merit. It’s a bit disingenuous to discard all of her analysis simply because a lot of it is problematic, since that stoops us to what we believe to be her level.

      I think the fairest response is just to respond to it intelligently; not with emotion, not with indignation, but to point out where she’s wrong. The sooner mature dialogue comes around, the better a cleaner, clearer unified voice can be weighed.

      • ShrektheHulk .

        Clone yourself and go forth to spread rationality among the people.

      • mbits

        Yep. I’m sure that David Duke had a lot of salient points to make. Why dismiss him entirely just because of his absurd extremist self-serving views amiright?!

        And so what about fatuglyorslutty.com? Because yup, men are never harassed online. Oh wait, they are the overwhelming majority of those who ARE harassed. For race, orientation, weight, and even accent.

        By the way, hows Anita treating you, now that what we’ve all been saying for almost three years has come to pass and she turns out to just be another Jack Thompson?

  • http://www.sypher-design.co.uk/ David Robinson

    It is merely a mirror of the creators mind.

    So I don’t see it as an issue, as it is that particular creators ‘art’. Whether we choose to take offense to it is our own problem. We are not forced to endure it. That is a choice.

    Some look at Tarantino movies with the over the top violence and objectification of women and love it for what it is. Others may see a mess and total inconsistency with their own views on violence. And deplore such a dramatization of things that are really happening in the real world.

    And that’s a fair view to have. Everyone is entitled to their own view of art. But they are not entitled to try and get the creator/artists to alter their art to meet that particular beholders expectations. It should be viewed completely in a vacuum, take it or leave it.

    The reason why you see a lot of the same tropes used in video games, is because a lot of the artists/creators on said games have a similar mindset. That is just the way it is right now. As more diverse creators are able to express their own art we will see a wider range of perspectives.

    The 70’s saw a wave of Blaxploitation films that if made today, would never see a release, the creators at the time were thinking along the same lines and aiming to fill demand. Things move on, the medium is not one thing, but whatever the creator chooses to fill with it.

    But regarding the art side of things; The general populations mood moves with the wind. So if you are creating art, be it writing, painting, movies, music or games then it can not be beholden to the current stature of its time. It must transcend it. Or be forever bogged down by the political correctness of its era.

  • chava

    I think sometimes organizations like this take things out of proportion. I remember reading either on one of my english classes or philosophy that literature imitates real life. Sometimes the other way around. Video game stories are the same as the books or movies we read and see. They try and imitate life as close as it can, but I think is irresponsible or naive for someone to play a game rated M and expect the story to be fit to everyone.

    Game stories are not much different than the movies we see, aside from the bad writing compare to big Hollywood movies, video games will try to imitate real life situations as close as it possibly can. Movies do the same, they are usually about the hero (male in most situations) trying to save either the princes or the world. There could be many reasons why it is like that, maybe its just they way they portrayed what they perceive life to be, but there will always be something someone will not like. You can’t expect video games to change that.

    Also correct me if I’m wrong but doesn’t the girl or prostitute mentioned from RDR help you in many ways not just the ones mentioned, the story also tries to get you attached to her character so maybe if you put it out of context it shows a different tale and it might not be necessarily the one intended.

Top